Editorial Policy

1. Authorship and review

Articles identify an author or the clinic editorial team. A practitioner profile explains the person’s role; readers can ask the clinic to confirm qualifications and registration. A medical-review credit is included only when that review has been confirmed. Authorship alone should not be read as independent clinical verification.

2. Sources and evidence

Reference lists link to the sources used for research-based statements. We distinguish traditional Ayurvedic concepts from clinical findings. The population, preparation, dose, duration and limitations of a study matter. Evidence for an ingredient does not establish the effects of a different finished formulation.

A source link supports the relevant statement; it does not mean the source organisation endorses this clinic or its products. Articles without references should be read as introductory explanations or practical information, rather than proof of effectiveness.

3. Editorial assistance and updates

Website text may be drafted or edited with AI assistance. AI assistance does not constitute medical review. Dates labelled “updated” describe editorial changes; they do not establish that a practitioner has reviewed the article on that date.

We aim to correct inaccurate wording and add useful sources as information is checked. Medical decisions require discussion with a qualified treating clinician.

4. Product information and commercial interests

Nav Healing Herbs operates this website and provides information about its own formulations. This is a commercial interest. Product pages should be checked against the current pack label and a practitioner’s prescription. The journal should not be read as an independent endorsement of those products.

5. Corrections and questions

If you notice an inaccurate statement, broken reference or unclear attribution, email the clinic with the page address and a description of the issue. Please avoid sending private medical records in a correction request.